SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Michael Perelman)
Date:
Sat May 19 17:17:48 2007
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>; from [log in to unmask] on Fri, May 18, 2007 at 05:12:44PM -0500
Message-ID:
References:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
Nor should we forget:

"One cannot find good under-forty economists who identify themselves or their work 
as 'keynesian'.  Indeed, people even take offence if referred to as Keynesians. At research seminars, people don't take Keynesian theorizing seriously any more; the 
audience starts to whisper and giggle at one another."

Lucas, Robert. 1980. "The Death of Keynesian Economics." Issues and Ideas (Winter).

Michael Perelman



ATOM RSS1 RSS2