SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (C.N.Gomersall)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:22 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
======================= HES POSTING ================= 
 
 
Mary Schweitzer asked: 
 
>Okay.  Where does mainstream economics differ from neoclassical economics? 
 
Sheila Dow uses "mainstream" to include (Marshallian-derived) neoclassical 
economics *and* (Walrasian-derived) GE theory. I like Tony Brewer's view, 
however, that these are not terms which can be pinned down. 
 
_________________________________________________________ 
C.N.Gomersall                         [log in to unmask] 
 
http://econ-www.newcastle.edu.au/economics/nick/nick.html 
_________________________________________________________ 
 
 
============ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ============ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2