SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:27 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
 
[Responding to J. Barkley Rosser's posting:] 
 
I don't understand your distinction. Surely for an economist it is 
only the utility that matters. There are both positive and negative 
externalities associated with eating. (Think of your grandmother making 
cookies for you when you were a child.)  True the other does not gain 
utility (or disutility) in the same manner, but there is a joint 
consumption. 
 
Rod Hay 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2