SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (John Womack)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:31 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
I think Waterman's point about a biological model is good. Quesnay was a 
doctor, and "circulation" is a powerful metaphor, which others had used 
before him and still others would later adopt to powerful effect. But 
"balance" and "equilibrium" are only implicit in this development. I think 
Mirowski's right: the conscious equilibrating hope through the 19th century 
was from physics; the main characters themselves said so, and on 
examination they prove as much. Biology as a grand, declared paradigm comes 
later. (Of course what the paradigm should be, is another question.) 
 
John Womack 
 
 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2