SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Mason Gaffney)
Date:
Mon Aug 20 09:01:51 2007
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Michael Perelman asks why not extend the Hayek knowledge principle to take
advantage of the knowledge of workers, when global corporations are so big.
He leaves out the intermediate solution of small business, where the
entrepreneur is also a worker. E.F. Schumacher of course is famous for
*Small is Beautiful*, and Veblen hinted at the same ideas in *Absentee
Ownership*. The movement for "appropriate" and "intermediate" and "soft"
technology flared up in the 1961-75 Camelot, but burned out quickly (or was
it doused out?). 

Can anyone point me to a modern economist who is ably rationalizing the case
for small business today?

Mason Gaffney


ATOM RSS1 RSS2