Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 1 Oct 2017 16:56:15 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Kevin, thank you for this. Still it was such a delight to see one of ours on a Sunday morning show. John, we're proud of you. We'll stay tuned.
Sent from my iPad
> On Oct 1, 2017, at 11:20 AM, Kevin Mac Donnell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> I was happy to see John Bird get the recognition that he got, but it wasn't
> the recognition that he deserved. There was no mention that he wrote a far
> superior ending to the story consistent with Twain's plot, characters, and
> themes. There was no mention of exactly how Random House/Doubleday co-opted
> (a much politer word than they deserve) the project in a mad scramble to
> exploit Mark Twain's name and foist off on an unsuspecting public a work by
> the Steads. I have no problem with the Steads; they were just following
> orders. But did anybody give them orders to toss Twain's themes out the
> window and pretend that making Johnny black was the only change they made
> that matters? I must also admit, sadly, that I'm disappointed by those who
> are willing to profit by all of this. Those who object are dismissed as
> "purists"--the word actually used in the report. This brings me back to the
> conclusion of my review: some readers will find the story charming, but it
> isn't Mark Twain doing the charming. Using Twain's name to sell this book is
> execrable (to borrow a favorite word of Twain's).
>
> Twainians are grateful that Twain did not follow the custom of so many
> authors and destroy his unpublished manuscripts, but if you have ever
> wondered why so many authors do so, you need look no further than this
> vulgar breach of literary ethics. This is not a Twain't; it's just a twaint.
>
> Kevin
> @
> Mac Donnell Rare Books
> 9307 Glenlake Drive
> Austin TX 78730
> 512-345-4139
> Member: ABAA, ILAB
> *************************
> You may browse our books at:
> www.macdonnellrarebooks.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barbara Schmidt
> Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2017 9:44 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Piece on Mark Twain Fairy Tale Tomorrow
>
> I think this is a case of a publisher pushing Mark Twain's name off on an
> unsuspecting public. As Kevin Mac Donnell would call it -- the present
> fairy tale is a "Twain't." I think there is a lot more to the
> "oleomargarine" connection and its influence on Twain's later works. I am
> looking forward to John Bird's scholarly interpretation along with the
> publication of the full manuscript.
>
> Barb
|
|
|