SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Roy Davidson)
Date:
Fri Feb 22 20:48:35 2008
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (5 lines)
Sumitra Shah has some interesting comments on the relevancy of mainstream economics. In my opinion, economics has become an arcane discipline for quite a long time. A review of the classical tradition from the French Physiocrats, Adam Smith, RIcardo, Mill and Marx would certainly seem in order for academics and "scholars" in economics or political economy as the discipline was referred to thru most of the 19th century. Also, Henry George deserves more than a paragraph or footnote in any history of economic thought.

Roy Davidson


ATOM RSS1 RSS2