SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Andrew Farrant)
Date:
Mon Dec 11 15:12:04 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
  
The person Doug argued with may have had a point (if they did a stack more work)  
  
The cartoon version of RTS (especially page 10) is a pretty accurate (albeit rough n'
ready) rendition of Hayek's logic in RTS:
  
http://www.mises.org/TRTS.htm  
  
A rather more nuanced argument can be found in: "When 'socialism' fails, then what?"
(Levy, Peart, Farrant). European Journal of Political Economy. 24 (1) 2005: 1064-1068.
  
&  
  
"The Spatial Politics of F. A. Hayek's Road to Serfdom" (ditto). European Journal of
Political Economy. 24 (1) 2005: 982-999.
  
& the other papers on Hayek (including very interesting commentary on RTS by David
Colander & Bruce Caldwell among others) in EJPE (all online if you have EJPE access)
  
Was the argument that so upset Doug made in a talk or in comments?  
  
  
Andrew Farrant  
  

ATOM RSS1 RSS2