Holy moley!!

Out go the invisible hand comparative advantage, demand and supply, and the quantity theory of money. How can these perspectives on the history of economics be adopted without destroying the subject matter? Have these people gone bonkers? 

"The inquiry seeks to contribute not only to history of economics but 
also to economics - instead of an orthodox outlook that ignores the 
possibility of such cross-fertilization."

Fat chance, it seems to me.

Pat Gunning