SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Peter G. Stillman)
Date:
Sun Apr 6 20:05:53 2008
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
Mason Gaffney, in describing (accurately) the original (10% of the 
produce of the land) and the current (10% of income), states that 
'the concept has been turned upside down'.  Others might say that it 
has been modernized:  that in the agricultural societies of old 
(including of 620 AD in Arabia), the produce of the land was a 
surrogate (and easily measurable) indicator of income, and that now, 
in non-agricultural societies, we use income because produce of the 
land is meaningless (or zero) for the many non-agricultural types.

Peter G. Stillman


ATOM RSS1 RSS2