SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Roy Davidson)
Date:
Mon Mar 10 18:43:15 2008
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (6 lines)
Pat Gunning refers to the "distinction between productive and unproductive labor." The Physiocrats and Adam Smith certainly emphasized this distinction. To the extent that it was meant to distinguish the production of wealth from the provision of services, I believe it is an important distinction.

It is unfortunate that the neo-classicals & others have forsaken a precise & functional definition of the term wealth. Of course, lumping goods & services together makes the aggregates more amenable to statistical treatment. However, tracing the laws governing the production & distribution of wealth thus becomes more difficult. Adam Smith in the W of N repeatedly referred to the real wealth as the annual produce of the land & labour of a society.

Roy Davidson

ATOM RSS1 RSS2