Date: |
Fri Mar 31 17:19:14 2006 |
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
----------------- HES POSTING -----------------
For a good argument that this was not what Smith believed, I recommend Stephen Holmes'
chapter 2, "The Secret History of Self-Interest" in his book *Passions and Constraint*
Holmes argues that Smith, along with Hume and other figures in the Scottish Enlightenment
thinkers, rather than describing people as self-interested, were *recommending* that
people become more self-interested, instead of being motivated by the self-destructive
passions of glory and honor-seeking, vengeance, religious fanaticism etc. Smith saw
commercial society as *desirable* precisely for its potential for shifting motivations
towards the interests and away from the passions. (This parallels Hirschman's *Passions
and Interests*, but I find that undergraduates have lots of trouble with this book; Holmes
is much clearer). If this is indeed Smith's view, then he would agree with Marx that
commercial society fosters self-interested behavior -- but they put it down on opposite
sides of the balance sheet!
Kevin Quinn
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask]
|
|
|