SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (John Medaille)
Date:
Thu Sep 28 18:00:11 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Malcolm Rutherford wrote:  
>I don't think the common law was entirely   
>spontaneous, as the central government of the   
>time was involved in the effort to have   
>local  courts adopt a common set of rules.  
  
On reading this discussion, I am somewhat   
confused as to what definition of "sponteneity"   
is being used. The complex system of common law   
courts are hardly a "spontaneous" phenomenon, by   
any definition of that term that I can locate.  
  
  
John C. Medaille  
  
  

ATOM RSS1 RSS2