SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Doug Mackenzie)
Date:
Tue Jul 31 09:13:08 2007
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
In reply to, Barkley Rosser,
perhaps it would be better to say that Coase thought
transaction costs are always positive and significant.
Words like high or large are less clear than
significant or negligible. Were transaction costs
negligible, we would not need to choose between
institutions that minimize these costs, so they must
be significant IF Coasean factors are actually what
determine institutional structure.

Doug Mackenzie 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2