SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
HES: Re: RVW--Waterman on Foley, _Adam's Fallacy: A Guide to Economic Theology_
From:
[log in to unmask] (Deirdre McCloskey)
Date:
Sun Nov 25 12:22:22 2007
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
Dear Kevin,

On the other hand, Tony Waterman can hardly be faulted for taking a 
presentist view of economics!  And after all a few things have happened 
in economic thinking since 1867.  Let's see. . . macroeconomics; 
marginalism (I admit that in its Max U form it has been something of a 
distraction); uncertainty.

Regards,


Deirdre McCloskey

ATOM RSS1 RSS2