------------ EH.NET BOOK REVIEW --------------
Published by EH.NET (February 2008)
Richard J. Smethurst, _From Foot Soldier to Finance Minister:
Takahashi Korekiyo, Japan's Keynes_. Cambridge MA: Harvard University
Press, 2007. xiv + 377 pp. $45 (hardcover), ISBN: 978-0-674-02601-8.
Reviewed for EH.NET by Michael Schiltz, Department of Oriental and
Slavonic Studies, University of Leuven.
Contrary to what could be expected from the biography of a prewar
Japanese statesman, _From Foot Soldier to Finance Minister_ is an
intimate and entertaining portrait of a man who is arguably Japan's
most important financier of the early twentieth century. Takahashi
Korekiyo duly deserves the attention Harvard East Asian monographs
chose to give him. Not only did he save his country from the Great
Depression; he also played a role in almost every event of importance
to Japan's macroeconomic choices and performance at the time. From
raising war loans abroad for the Russo-Japanese War in 1904-05 until
the managing (accommodation?) of the outrageous demands for increased
military spending in the late thirties, Takahashi played the part of
fixer, leader, negotiator, and much more. And who could be more
qualified to write this biography than Richard Smethurst? As
longstanding scholar of Japan's prewar economic history, he is the
author of multiple articles about both Takahashi's educational
formation and his policies -- and people in the Bank of Japan close
to him (such as Fukai Eigo). It is also fully to Smethurst's credit
that this book is an enticing read: in a lucid and fluent style, he
sheds light on many of the lesser known aspects of Takahashi's
education, always with attention to the latter's interest in
self-documentation and irony -- think for instance of Takahashi's
relating of his indulgence in drinking alcohol as a youngster (p. 22)
or his naive signing into indentured servitude while being in America
(p. 26-29).
The book is conveniently separated into four parts, which can further
be grouped into two. Part I, roughly comprising chapters 1 through 7,
deals with Takahashi's early experiences and education, in the
broadest sense of the word. Smethurst points out Takahashi's personal
relationship with the Scottish banker Allan Shand and the missionary
Guido Verbeck. Of particular importance is the relationship with
Maeda Masana, one of Takahashi's mentors but mostly famous for his
political struggle with the elder statesman Matsukata Masayoshi about
the nature of Japanese economic development in the late nineteenth
century (the choice between agricultural and industrial development).
It is indeed surprising that Takahashi, as the true champion of
modern Japanese capitalism, sided with the proponents of Japan's
agricultural development, but Smethurst finds an explanation in
Takahashi's pragmatism: Japan was, so it is argued, hardly able to
embark on "top-down" industrialization, but should have embraced a
program of decentralized development fit to its character as a still
largely agricultural economy.
One may -- justifiably -- object that Smethurst has devoted too much
attention to Takahashi's early years, and dwelled too long on events
and happenings that border on the anecdotal or trivial detail. But
then again, this is not a book on the Great Depression alone, as
Smethurst warns us in the acknowledgments (p. vii): "As I
investigated [the Japanese economy of the early 1930s], the name
Takahashi Korekiyo, often with the epithet "Japan's Keynes," appeared
repeatedly. So I bought several biographies of him and began working
backward, from the Sh?wa depression to Takahashi's childhood. The
more I read about him, the more fascinated I became by the man --
until at last I decided to abandon the economic downturn for
Takahashi."
Still, it will be the later chapters about the Great Depression
(chapters 12 and 13) that will invite the most scrutiny from economic
and financial historians. These chapters are very well structured,
and Smethurst is aware of the problems he has to tackle. This is the
"Holy Grail" of the financial history, as Ben Bernanke once argued,
and people like Bernanke, Charles Kindleberger and Robert Skidelsky
(the biographer of John Maynard Keynes) have stressed Takahashi's
uniqueness. What needs explanation is the fact that the Great
Depression hardly seems to have affected Japan, whereas in other
countries, most notably the United States, its effects were so
protracted. "In real terms, the Great Depression scarcely occurred in
Japan. From 1926 through the 1930's, real gross national product
(GNP) in each succeeding year never declined from its previous level.
The economy did experience some stagnation in the 1929-31 period;
real GNP rose by only 0.5 percent in 1929, 1.1 percent in 1930, and
0.4 percent in 1931. For the remainder of the 1930's, however, real
GNP grew at an average annual rate of 5.8 percent" (Nanto and Takagi
1985, pp. 369-74).
So, who and what kept the Japanese economy on course? Both Japanese
and Western observers have pointed to Takahashi's surprisingly
Keynesian policies: 1) removing Japan from the gold standard, 2)
devaluing the yen vis-a-vis the dollar and pound, 3) reducing the
Bank of Japan's prime rate, 4) introducing legislation to raise the
limit of the Bank of Japan's issuance of bank notes, 5) increasing
government spending, and 6) making up for the difference between
government expenditures and income not by raising taxes but by
pioneering a very specific agreement with the Bank of Japan.
Although avoiding the difficult (and sometimes highly technical)
debate about policy behavior during the Great Depression, Smethurst
systematically reiterates several assessments of Takahashi's
reflationary policies (p. 239):
... was this not a case of social dumping or "beggaring thy
neighbor," that is, saving your own trade ship at the expense of
others? Was Takahashi guilty of a "reckless fiscal policy" because
his introduction of the sale of treasury bonds to the central bank
rather than directly on the open market would lead to dangerous
inflation after his assassination in 1936? Was not the policy of
selling treasury bonds to the Bank of Japan rather than to the public
dangerous because it gave finance ministry bureaucrats and central
bankers the power to expand the money supply free from market
constraints? Did not Takahashi's spending, which went primarily to
rural relief and the military, play a vital rule in the rise of
militarism and the road to Japan's aggressive war against China, the
United States and their allies?
Smethurst chooses not to confine his analysis to the mere number
crunching of many cliometric studies but instead includes references
to the writings of Takahashi and his aides, effectively erasing
several of the above suspicions. I am sympathetic to Smethurst's
conclusions about Takahashi's doubtlessly limited room for political
maneuvering, including where it concerns the question regarding his
alleged role in furthering excessive military spending. I believe he
has presented a strong case for the latter's appreciation of existing
problems and their solution. _From Foot Soldier to Finance Minister_
is furthermore helpful in explaining financial technologies as the
time, as example the aforementioned hikiuke system of selling
government bonds at low interest directly to the Bank of Japan.
What does puzzle me, therefore, is not Smethurst's assessment of
Takahashi's policies. I am less convinced by the way Smethurst
pictures the motives of Inoue Junnosuke, Takahashi's antipode and, as
in the proverbial opposite, the proponent of a deflationary monetary
policy. As demonstrated by Mark Metzler (2002), foreign pressure to
have Japan move onto the gold standard was substantial; hence,
Inoue's defense of a deflationary policy, however disastrous, was not
necessarily a mere expression of political ambition -- it was,
however mistaken, the orthodoxy of the time. I furthermore sense that
methodology similar to Smethurst's reading of Takahashi would reveal
the sincerity of Inoue's motives (again, however ill-inspired they
may have been) -- an idea to which again Metzler (2006, pp. 159 ff.)
lends plausibility.
This is, however, a minor criticism of a work that splendidly and
entertainingly facilitates our understanding of difficult yet
formative moments in prewar Japanese political and economic history.
This book deserves to be read not only by students of Japanese
economic history, but should be in the hands of every serious student
of modern Japanese history, as well.
References:
Mark Metzler, "American Pressure for Financial Internationalization
in Japan on the Eve of the Great Depression," _Journal of Japanese
Studies_, Vol. 28, No. 2 (Summer 2002): 277-300.
Mark Metzler, _Lever of Empire: The International Gold Standard and
the Crisis of Liberalism in Prewar Japan_, University of California
Press, 2006.
Dick Nanto and Shinji Takagi, "Korekiyo Takahashi and Japan's
Recovery from the Great Depression," _American Economic Review Papers
and Proceedings_, Vol. 75, No. 2 (May, 1985): 369-74.
Michael Schiltz (postdoctoral fellow, University of Leuven)
specializes in the financial history of Japan. He is the author of,
among others, "An 'Ideal Bank of Issue': The Banque Nationale de
Belgique as a Model for the Bank of Japan," for which he received the
_Financial History Review_ 2007 Prize for Young Scholars. He is
currently finishing a book manuscript entitled _The Money Doctors
from Japan_, which covers the activities of government-appointed
Japanese financial advisers in the (semi-)colonies of the Japanese
empire before 1937.
Copyright (c) 2008 by EH.Net. All rights reserved. This work may be
copied for non-profit educational uses if proper credit is given to
the author and the list. For other permission, please contact the
EH.Net Administrator ([log in to unmask]; Telephone: 513-529-2229).
Published by EH.Net (February 2008). All EH.Net reviews are archived
at http://www.eh.net/BookReview.
-------------- FOOTER TO EH.NET BOOK REVIEW --------------
EH.Net-Review mailing list
[log in to unmask]
http://eh.net/mailman/listinfo/eh.net-review
|