LISTSERV - SHOE Archives - LISTSERV.YORKU.CA

SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

	LISTSERV Archives
	SHOE Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Condense Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Content-Type:	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender:	Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:	Re: james mill on imperialism
From:	michael perelman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Sun, 14 Oct 2012 16:45:04 -0700
In-Reply-To:	<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (25 lines)

Radhika Desai wrote:
> Could it be in his History of British India? In it James Mill re-directs his anti-aristocratic temper to the upper castes in India and this the postcolonialists read as being 'anti-indian'.


It could be there.  Several sources suggest that the article was
inspired by his work with the East India Company.  I suspect that the
quotation was an elaboration by Hobson of his sentiments in the
article:



5: "colonies were planted wholly for the benefit of the Roman aristocracy."


-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA
95929

530 898 5321
fax 530 898 5901
http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.YORKU.CA