SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pat Gunning <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:16:35 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Julian, as I recall, we dealt with this issue before on this list. 
The question before, as I recall, was not what Smith actually said 
but how what he said should be interpreted by economists today. The 
fact that a prominent economist misquotes Smith is, it seems to me, a 
much less important issue than the question of correct meaning.

Regarding your comment on Gavin Kennedy, capital is a pretty 
important concept in Smith's vision, isn't it? What more important 
"item," in the classical view, is involved in a businessperson's 
pursuit of profit?


Pat Gunning

ATOM RSS1 RSS2