SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Martin C. Tangora" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:38:12 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Fred Foldvary wrote:
 >When highways are privately owned, the owner has an incentive to 
charge tolls
 >at least high enough to prevent congestion, and a government
 >seeking sound policy would do likewise.  Hence periodic jams such
 >as during rush hour are the result of governmental failure to
 >make users pay the costs of the negative externalities.
 >A pure free market would not experience periodic traffic jams.


This seems self-contradictory to me; what am I missing?
The second sentence says that traffic jams are caused by
government failure to act, and the third sentence says
they are caused by the market failing to be free.
Does "free market" include governmental imposition
of external costs?  If not, then I don't see the consistency.


Martin C. Tangora

ATOM RSS1 RSS2