SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Roger Backhouse <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 9 Dec 2009 08:42:11 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
I realise that others on this list may not accept that this is a 
statement of the accelerator and think of Aftalion, Clark and 
Bickerdicke as the original formulators of the idea, but consider the 
following quotation from Hobson and Mummery (1889, pp. 85-6):

"Thus if a community increases its consumption from 10x wealth to 11x 
wealth a year, production must during the year in which this increase 
takes place exceed consumption by 4x wealth in order to accumulate 
the additional forms of capital required: that is to say, production 
must during this year amount to 15x wealth. So soon, however, as 
consumption, having reached 11x annually, no longer increases, a 
production of 11x annually alone is required."

As one might expect in a theorist who focused on the problem 
under-consumption, and the level of saving required to sustain a 
given growth rate, consumption is what drives the accumulation of 
capital. This would seem to echo the views expressed 20 to 30 years 
later that Daniele Besomi cites.

Roger Backhouse

ATOM RSS1 RSS2