SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
David Hammes <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:18:23 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines)
Does anyone else share my sense of rather delightful irony when 
reading Cochrane's statement? It could have easily been written or 
spoken by Keynes. It rather piquantly sums up his approach to 
economic problems and economics, that is, if Skidelsky's biography 
can be believed.

David Hammes

ATOM RSS1 RSS2