SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Mason Gaffney <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:53:19 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
To Julian Wells, you can't have it both ways, saying roads are a free market
if they are tolled, and also if they are not.

Fred Foldvary's point is that in a free market the owner of a road, public
or private, will restrict entry to on optimal point, well thin of massive
congestion a la tragedy of the commons: free unlimited access is not what a
complete market does. Since you are responding to Fred, you should get on
the same page

Mason Gaffney

ATOM RSS1 RSS2