Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:17:50 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> ... on Fred's
> claim if "all activity" is understood to include the things
> that happen "inside" the entities that comprise the
> spontaneous order.
> Steve Horwitz
The inside acts are operational, the parties having made
constitutional voluntary choices.
> misleading in his equation of "spontaneous"
> with "of one's own free will."
"Spontaneous" can apply to an order, or to a choice.
> This is emphatically
> not the idea of "spontaneous" that is being used by Hayek
> and others in this tradition. The "spontaneity," as I
> noted in an earlier note, referred to the unplanned nature
> of the order that emerged not the actions that comprise the
> eventual emergence of that order.
If an order is unplanned, then it must have been the result of
individual voluntary choices. I see no contradiction.
Unplanned order means not imposed by a state, hence the result of
individual choice. The spontaneous order is an outcome of spontaneous action.
Fred Foldvary
|
|
|