Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 26 Jul 2014 08:58:56 +0200 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear Colleagues,
In the Methodology of economics, Mark Blaug wrote :
he was unable to meet the objection of many of his contemporaries that
the very notion of gravity
acting instantaneously at a distance without any material medium to
carry the force - ghostly fingers clutching through the void! - is
utterly metaphysical. (cf. snd edition, p. 6).
Actually Blaug has added several references in footnote 2:
Toulmin, S., and J. Goodfield. 1963. The Fabric of the Heavens. London:
Penguin Books., pp. 281-2;
Toulmin and Goodfield, 11965. The Architecture of Matter. London:
Penguin Books, pp. 217-20;
Hanson, N. R. 1965. Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. pp. 90-1;
Losee, J. 1972. A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science.
London: Oxford University
Press., pp. 90-3
But I could not check any (except Losee). When I read this sentence
three decades ago, I took "ghostly fingers" for an allusion to
Berkeley's Analyst (Criticising "fluxions", Berkeley wrote: May we not
call them the ghosts of departed quantities?). But working on Smith's
History of Astronomy, I am afraid I was wrong and Mark Blaug did not
quote Berkeley at all and could have another author or passage in mind.
Has anybody a suggestion? (I cannot check Blaug's references myself
except Losee)
best regards
---
Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection avast! Antivirus est active.
http://www.avast.com
|
|
|