TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Fred Kaplan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 5 Mar 2004 12:23:41 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2 lines)
Dear Forum: Though Mr. Kipen didn't respond to my email of mid-February, I believe he needs to rethink the 1866 speculation; so too does Philip Fanning. The 1866 speculation is untenable. October-November 1864. See The Singular Mark Twain, pp. 126-127.Best, Fred Kaplan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2