SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Luca Fiorito <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:49:37 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Harro: let me complicate things a little more. 
There is a clear discontinuity in the
evolution of Knight's thought -- a "break" which 
came immediately after the publication
of RUP. The main focus of Knight's "recantation" 
-- as he called it in a long letter to
Viner -- concerns Knight's change of attitude 
towards behaviorism (which is in turn
related to Knight's reading of Mach and 
Poincarč). I wonder if this was also the cause
of his decline of interest toward the general 
issue of uncertainty. I recently published
a little note on this which might help you also 
in connection to Bergson's influence.
Fiorito, Luca(2009)'Frank H. Knight, pragmatism, 
and American institutionalism: A
note',The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought,16:3,475 — 487

Luca Fiorito

ATOM RSS1 RSS2