Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:14:49 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Would one of you who knew Ed Branch more closely please write and post an
obituary? I swapped multiple e-mails with him beginning around 2002. I was
always amazed his depth of knowledge. He would frequently begin things,
"I've sold my library, but I think..." and then rattle off verbatim
something profound, but little-known. He had an amazingly agile mind --
even though he was in his late 80s and early 90s. He was extremely generous
and still excited by new material or a provocative thought. He enjoyed and
encouraged people who were doing research.
He was kind to me, even when I was reinventing the same wheel he had
created long ago. I remember a specific incident where we corresponded
about a letter in a Hannibal paper from 1861 signed Sam and referencing the
"seat of war." I was quite excited. He was thoroughly familiar with it.
Despite his vast knowledge, it was obvious that Ed never surrendered to the
temptations of scholasticism. He never had a whiff of that
"everyone-who-matters-knows-that" condescencion.
You mourn differently when someone has lived to be 93. Although his life
was fulfilled, it seems to me that Ed's death is a real loss to this field.
It is definitely a milepost. It would be nice if one of you who knew him
better would post an appreciation of his life.
I thought he was a great guy.
Terrell Dempsey
|
|
|