SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pat Gunning <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 6 Dec 2010 15:29:02 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
On 12/6/2010 1:54 AM, Eric Schliesser wrote:
> Roy's underlying question is an important one. Moreover, it's good 
> that 'we' as a community occasionally try to instruct and challenge 
> each other in what 'we' are really about.
> Yet, this conversation is drifting into suggestions that will enhance 
> HET as an intellectual backwater, rather than exciting place to 
> explore new approaches. (This is especially unfortunate because we are 
> suddenly living in a time again when 'our' historical perspective can 
> make a genuine difference to intellectual conversations about the 
> nature of economics and the economy.)
>
How so can it make a genuine difference, Eric. Do you have anything 
specific in mind?

-- 
Pat Gunning
Professor of Economics
Melbourne, Florida
http://www.nomadpress.com/gunning/welcome.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2