EAEPE Conference 2010 will be organized in Bordeaux, 28-30 October 2010.
Methodology of Economics Research Area invites paper proposals for the
EAEPE 2010 Conference. The proposals should be in line with the themes
of the research area (see below).
The abstract should clearly mention (i) the title of the paper, (ii)
name of the author(s) and full address of the corresponding author
(postal address, phone, fax and email) (iii) the aim and the main
argument of the paper, and (iv) the keywords and relevant JEL codes. The
abstract should consist of 600-700 words.
Important deadlines:
* Deadline for abstract submission: May 15, 2010
* Notification for abstract acceptance: June 30, 2010
* Deadline for paper submission: September 15, 2010
The description of Methodology of Economics Research Area is as follows:
[Methodology of Economics Research Area]
Economic methodology, broadly conceived, is the study of how economics
functions, how it could function, and how it should function and of
the various presuppositions and conditions of all these. It examines
various meta theoretical key concepts such as theory and model,
assumption and idealization, causation and explanation, testing and
progress, rhetoric and truth, social construction and pluralism; as well
as various goals, styles and constraints of research, such as
mathematical modelling and experimentation, grounded theory and case
study, causal and functional explanation, forecasting and policy,
ontological and institutional (academic and otherwise) constraints on
economic inquiry. It also sets out to examine fundamental substantial
concepts such as rationality, choice, routine, trust, institution,
evolution, coordination, equilibrium, path dependence.
Three dimensions seem particularly relevant to these inquiries within
EAEPE. The first is often put in terms of orthodoxy and heterodoxy. The
second is in terms of realism and non-realism. Neither of these
dimensions and the respective distinctions is unproblematic, and hence
should be part of the domain of methodological inquiry itself. The
distinctions also do not coincide as there are realist versions of
“orthodoxy” and non-realist versions of “heterodoxy”, which helps to
underline the fact that none of the four categories on the two
dimensions is uniform. There is a methodological and conceptual jungle
there, and it is our task to develop maps that help us orient ourselves
so as to do better economics without misrepresenting current practice.
A third dimension deals with what is and what is not economics. Are
there, or should there be, any disciplinary boundaries? If so, where are
they located? On what conditions, and how, are they to be crossed?
Economics participates in interdisciplinary encounters in a variety of
ways and directions, influencing other disciplines and being influenced
by them. For example, while political science, sociology, and science
studies have been partly reshaped by an increasing use of economic
concepts and methods, economics itself is being transformed due to its
encounters with cognitive and life sciences. Institutional and
evolutionary economics lie at the crossroads of these trends. Since none
of this is simple, uniform, and straightforward, careful analyses are
needed to track the detailed structure of these processes. What drives
and shapes them? Which parts of economics participate in these
encounters and how? How are we to evaluate the outcomes? How does all
this relate with the first two dimensions?
Please contact the Methodology of Economics Research Area Coordinators
Uskali Mäki (uskali.maki [at] helsinki.fi ) and N. Emrah Aydinonat
(aydinonat [at] gmail.com ) if you have any questions.
* For more information about the conference and about research areas
please visit the EAEPE website: http://eaepe.org/
--
N. Emrah AYDINONAT
http://www.neaydinonat.com/
http://twitter.com/aydinonat
|
