SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Samuel Bostaph <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:23:16 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
I always use the dates given in historical documents unless there is 
an error on the author's part. The reasoning is simple: those who 
create documents create them in their calendar context. Historians 
may inhabit other calendar contexts. If we are to communicate 
successfully with one another now and in the future, we need a point 
of reference that we all recognize. The original document date (or 
time) is such a point.
Adam Smith's baptismal date was June 5, 1723, to those involved in it.

Samuel Bostaph

ATOM RSS1 RSS2