SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Pat Gunning <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:30:05 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
If A invents a machine, B copies it and makes a million, B is 
benefiting at A's expense. If A copies a passage in economics and B 
copies it, B might make a million. But he does not make it at A's 
expense.  Much more than a passage or even an entire article must be 
copied for B to hurt A to any significant degree.

Also, if B is free, under the law, to copy A's invention, it harms 
SOCIETY because the prospect of having an invention copied reduces 
the incentive to invent. But what would happen if economists were 
free, under the law, to copy each other's words without citations? 
Would anyone be harmed besides the members of the economics 
profession? And would the harm to original writers be greater than 
the gain to the copiers?

Pat Gunning

ATOM RSS1 RSS2