SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:37 2006
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Ron Stanfield)
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
Feldstein I expect to support a saving centered theory of economic 
progress.  
A bit more surprising is Les Thurow, HEAD TO HEAD. After arguing that 
capital  
flows freely and that invention and innovation are also quickly diffused, 
so  
that the key is the education of the mass labor force, he wrings his hands  
over the low saving in USA. Yet his argument would seem to imply that if a  
country educates its population, provides public order and tranquility, 
then  
capital and innovative ideas will flow into from abroad. 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2