SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Hansjoerg Klausinger <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:42:41 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Dear colleagues,

This is my second Hayek-related query. It appeals in particular to 
experts on the history of German-language economics. In "The Ricardo 
Effect" (1942) Hayek has the following footnote on the "internal rate 
of return":

"The term 'internal rate of return' is borrowed from Kenneth E. 
Boulding, 'The Theory of a Single Investment', Quarterly Journal of 
Economics, vol. 49, May 1935, pp. 478 et seq. Its German equivalent 
(more precisely the term 'innerer Zinssatz') has been used earlier, I 
believe, in discussions of the effects of credit rationing, but I 
cannot now recollect when or by whom."

I have been at a loss identifying the source that Hayek could not 
recollect. Therefore, I have also been unable to check if the term 
"innerer Zinssatz" is correct, or perhaps only a typing error for the 
more common "interner Zinssatz".

Once again, I will be most grateful for any help.

Hansjoerg Klausinger

ATOM RSS1 RSS2