SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 12 Nov 2011 12:55:35 -0500
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Subject:
From:
Alan G Isaac <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Organization:
American University
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines)
On 11/12/2011 12:32 AM, Doug Mackenzie wrote:
> Well, if we are talking about the Phillips curve, its not a very useful analytical/empirical schema, the profession rejected it

I'd like a definition of "rejected".
E.g., http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=phillips+curve

Thanks,
Alan Isaac

ATOM RSS1 RSS2