SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Peter J Boettke <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:24:36 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
Roger,

I will read your paper. But to make the point clearer, it is about 
the setting of the tax rate or the subsidy rate that would 
internalize the externality.

And also I think Coase (and Buchanan's) critique was directed at the 
state of the art welfare economics in public economics at the time 
that they were writing.

Pete Boettke

ATOM RSS1 RSS2