SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:42:23 -0700
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Polylogism in Marxist
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
michael perelman <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines) 
I might be tempted to respond to this proposition if I could make
sense of it.  The problem may be that we people here in Chico have our
own logic.

By the way, I would like to learn where Marx said anything as
simplistic as thought is determined by class interest -- as if he
precluded other influences.

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Pat Gunning <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> How is this related to Marx? My answer is that Marx believed that thought is
> determined by class interest and that the economics of Smith was bourgeois
> economics. See the reference below. How is Marxism related to racism?  The
> racists argued that thought is determined by race.



-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA
95929

530 898 5321
fax 530 898 5901
http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2