SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"A. M. C. Waterman" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:08:51 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
Agreed with Lazzarini. Both Malthus (High Price of Provisions, 1800) 
and Chalmers (National Resources, 1808) were at least as 'formal' and 
'Ricardian' as Ricardo -- Chalmers with considerably more 
sophistication. For that matter, both Hume's Balance of Trade (1752) 
and chap X of Malthus's first Essay (1798) may be regarded as 
coherent and successful attempts to model the dynamic stability of 
equilibrium. For examples of mathematical modelling in the 18th C -- 
chiefly by Italians if I remember rightly -- see Theocharis (1961).

A. M. C. Waterman

ATOM RSS1 RSS2