SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Manuela Mosca <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sun, 16 Jun 2013 08:59:26 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (128 lines)
Thanks again for these letters. Incidentally, it's interesting to notice
that the President of Italy was taken as THE example in the world of no
power at all!
Manuela Mosca

> Ric,
> Thanks for posting this teaser of a great project. Wonderful letters.
Harro Maas
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Ric Holt <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>  Some of you might appreciate these letters between Joan Robinson and
>> Ken
>> Galbraith concerning her Richard Ely Lecture at the AEA meetings in
1971. I
>> was told not to add attachments to our e-mails to this list, so just a
few
>> here. Besides wanting to shake up the establishment with inviting Joan
to
>> give the prestigious Ely lecture, she also represented a goal Galbraith
had
>> as President of the AEA -- to achieve equality for women in the
economics
>> profession. Something interesting: the letters show the importance Mac
Bundy played in providing funds from the Ford Foundation to support this
>> goal. Also there is the interesting exchange between George Borts,
Managing
>> Editor of the AEA, and Paul Davidson and others about the selection
process
>> of articles for the Review -- a very contentious discussion. Finally,
some
>> interesting exchanges between Galbraith and Jim Tobin and Ken Arrow as
they
>> tried to work on the transitions from one AEA president to the next
during
>> this period while supporting certain long term goals. The achievements
of
>> Tobin, Galbraith and Arrow as Presidents of the Association was very
impressive. The profession owes all three a lot.
>> The Galbraith Letter Project is still plugging along. I have collected
over 11,000 letters so far and in the process of providing annotation to
>> them.
>> Ric Holt
>> 20 July 1971
>> Dear Ken,
>> Many thanks for your letter and comic cuts. I propose as the title of
my
>> lecture, “The Second Crisis of Economic Theory”. I will put in a few
highbrow bits, but on the whole I think I can treat the subject in a way
>> that the broad masses ought to understand.
>> Yours sincerely,
>> Joan Robinson
>> 62 Grange Road
>> Cambridge
>>  December 29, 1971
>> Dear Ken:
>> I much enjoyed the opportunity to have a go at AEA. I am grateful to
you
>> for arranging it. I found that having you as President has aroused my
hope
>> among the dissent groups that something might be done about the Review.
There is first of all the question [of] the papers joint between URPE and
>> AEA being printed in the proceedings and, more generally, the editorial
policy of the Review to only print neoclassical stuff (They even
refused
>> a
>> piece by Franklin Fisher because he came out on my side about the
production function!) Gurley has been treated insolently. For the sake of
>> their own reputation as the organ of the profession I think they should
be
>> made to see how they look.
>> It was very noticeable how the younger generation was reacting at the
meetings.
>> With thanks once more
>> Yours
>>   Joan
>> January 12, 1972
>> Dear Joan:
>>             Many thanks for your note. If the meetings were slightly
>> less
>> stuffy and neoclassical than usual, it was owing more to you than to
anyone
>> else. It was extremely good of you to accept the invitation and your
paper
>> was absolutely superb.
>>             The president of the Association, as I think I said once in
>> New Orleans, has powers closely paralleling the President of Italy, but
perhaps less. Indeed this is the way in which all establishment
maintain
>> themselves. One diffuses power through people who are reliably like of
mind. But I hope to have some slight influence on the Journals, and I’m
also going to make a particularly determined effort to revise hiring
practices in the profession and see if I can win a better break for women.
>> A good deal has been done in the past couple of years to put the
problems
>> of the black and Spanish-speaking minorities on the professional
conscience. Discrimination against women remains in some degree the most
>> blatant.
>>             Would you, when you get back to Cambridge, write me a
little
>> more complete observation and complaint – something that I can send to
the
>> editor to ask for his comments. Sometimes the knowledge of an
>> unsatisfied
>> clientele produces some results.
>> Love,
>> John Kenneth Galbraith
> --
> *Harro Maas **| *Associate professor in history and methodology of
economics
> * **|* Utrecht University School of Economics (USE) *|** **Faculty of
Law,
> Economics & Governance **|* Kriekenpitplein 21-22 *|* Room 109* **|
*3584
> EC Utrecht *| *Tel:+ 31 30 2536287 *|* M: +31638144753l *|
> [log in to unmask]** * *| *URL:http://www.uu.nl/leg/staff/HBJBMaas *| *
*
> *
> [image: cid:image001.jpg@01CE683C.38CCDEC0]


-- 
Manuela Mosca
Universita' del Salento - Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Economia
Universita' di Bologna - Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche
Content Manager of the ESHET website
ssrn author page:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=352869
website: http://www.dsems.unile.it/mosca/index.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2