SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 Mar 2016 10:52:31 +0900
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Literature on the Methodenstreit
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
From:
Yukihiro Ikeda <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines) 
Dear all,

Subjectivism and Objectivism in the History of Economic Thought, Routledge, 2012. (edited by Kiichiro Yagi and myself) 
might be of interest to those interested in the Methodenstreit.

Both 
Professor Shionoya's paper, "Austrian Subjectivism and Hermeneutical Economics" and 
my own paper, "Carl Menger's Subjectivism: Types, Economic Subjects, and Microfoundation" 
were written from a methodological point of view, although our standing points are very different.

Cheers,

Yukihiro Ikeda

**********
Yukihiro Ikeda
Department of Economics
Keio University
Mita 2-15-45, Minato-ku
108-8345 Tokyo, Japan
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
HP: http://members3.jcom.home.ne.jp/cmenger/
**********

ATOM RSS1 RSS2