Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:55:24 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear All,
Could anyone point me to the literature on the debate over whether we
should think of Microeconomics or Macroeconomics as the fundamental
aspect of the discipline?
Gabriel Martinez
Associate Professor and Chairman 239-280-1611
Department of Economics [log in to unmask]
Ave Maria University www.avemaria.edu/economics
5050 Ave Maria Boulevard, Ave Maria, Florida 34142-9505
"truth cannot be contrary to truth; ... truth often seems contrary to
truth;
... we must be patient with such appearances, and not be hasty
to pronounce them to be really of a more formidable character" (JH
Newman)
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message.
|
|
|