SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Gabriel Martinez <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:55:24 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Dear All,

Could anyone point me to the literature on the debate over whether we
should think of Microeconomics or Macroeconomics as the fundamental
aspect of the discipline?

Gabriel Martinez

Associate Professor and Chairman                  239-280-1611
Department of Economics            [log in to unmask]
Ave Maria University            www.avemaria.edu/economics

5050 Ave Maria Boulevard, Ave Maria, Florida 34142-9505

"truth cannot be contrary to truth; ... truth often seems contrary to
truth; 
... we must be patient with such appearances, and not be hasty 
to pronounce them to be really of a more formidable character" (JH
Newman)

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2