SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Michael Perelman)
Date:
Fri Sep 14 07:37:05 2007
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>; from [log in to unmask] on Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 05:10:44PM -0500
Message-ID:
References:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
As someone, who like Fred Lee, was discussed in the heterodox article, 
I am chagrined that openness should be seen as a defect in the History 
of Economics.  Where else can I share with Austrians, Keynesians, and 
other disparate types?  Maybe being denied status as economists is a 
badge of honor if economics insists on being so insecure that it cannot 
broach any dissent.

Michael Perelman


ATOM RSS1 RSS2