SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:22 2006
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Robert Leeson)
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
 
I have a vague memory of a question regarding the origin of the term 
"neoclassical synthesis" or "Keynesian neoclassical synthesis".  I may have 
found the answer.  In Economic Theory and Wages (in The Impact of the 
Union, 
McCord Wright, ed) Paul Samuelson (1951, 336) states that "a compromise 
doctrine has emerged from the combination of classical, neoclassical, 
Keynesian and neo Keynesian analysis.  A legitimate and convienient name 
for 
this common core is, I suggest, 'neoclasical'". 
 
Robert Leeson 
[log in to unmask] 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2