SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:42 2006
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
Robert Whaples' review is properly headed "Economic History in a 
*'Mainstream'* Reference Work." I bought the first edition several years 
ago, with the intent to add it to my course outline. I read (most of) it 
and dropped that idea. It represents the sort of 'mainstream' that equates 
economics with the neoclassical-cum-econometric paradigm: measurement 
without theory, theory without people, people without history. Most modern 
introductory textbooks take the same approach to the teaching of our 
discipline, so why prescribe a short-order cookbook for our students? 
 
Jesse Vorst 
 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2