SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 May 2014 14:45:01 -0400
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: A "very careful scholar"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
From:
Alan G Isaac <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 
As far as I know the Shenoy quote is second hand, but it is from
a good source: http://www.unites.uqam.ca/philo/pdf/Caldwell_2003-01.pdf
Assuming the accuracy of the Shenoy quote (from an email, as reported by
Caldwell) and of the Burrows quote (from a 2012 email reported by Leeson)
-- and I assume both are accurate -- one suspects that having the entire
email received by Caldwell would prove illuminating.  The actual quotes
offered so far are not in logical contradiction, but to reconcile them
would seem to require that the analysis was hers rather than any by
the CLLC, as Burrows and Antonia report that as far as they are aware,
no CLLC analysis was performed.

Alan Isaac



On 5/14/2014 1:33 PM, Samuel Bostaph wrote:
> I would be appreciative of Robert Leeson giving complete citations for his alleged Hayek and Shenoy quotations.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2