SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 24 Dec 2011 10:02:35 -0800
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
From:
mason gaffney <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Steve Kates writes:

"We should therefore be looking at
alternatives to this Keynesian vision, and in my view, the most useful
place to look would be at the theories of the cycle developed by those
long ignored classical economists who quite well understood that
recessions were a periodic certainty, had explanations for the causes of
such recessions and knew what to do when they inevitably occurred." 

That is piquing, but please:

1. name the ignored classicals
2. describe their explanations for recessions
3. tell us their remedies.

Then we'll have something to discuss.

Mason Gaffney

ATOM RSS1 RSS2