LISTSERV - SHOE Archives - LISTSERV.YORKU.CA

SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

	LISTSERV Archives
	SHOE Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: Backhouse and Bateman, "Wanted: Worldly Philosophers"
From:	James Forder <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:24:27 +0000
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (19 lines)

well they did not stop using the *word*, but that is not really the 
point: 
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&pdftype=1&fid=7879911&jid=HET&volumeId=32&issueId=03&aid=7879909

James Forder
Fellow and Tutor in Economics
Tutor for Graduate Admissions
Balliol College Oxford

On 12/11/2011 17:55, Alan G Isaac wrote:
> On 11/12/2011 12:32 AM, Doug Mackenzie wrote:
>> Well, if we are talking about the Phillips curve, its not a very useful analytical/empirical schema, the profession rejected it
>
> I'd like a definition of "rejected".
> E.g., http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=phillips+curve
>
> Thanks,
> Alan Isaac

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.YORKU.CA