SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 9 Dec 2012 09:25:16 -0500
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
From:
Alan G Isaac <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
On 12/8/2012 10:09 PM, Steve Kates wrote:
> Why, then, does anyone think Keynes was right and the classics were wrong?


Because they care about the evidence.  E.g.,
http://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/qjecon/v107y1992i2p709-38.html

Alan Isaac

PS Of course the question above is not very helpfully phrased.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2