This is insane. Avner does cite Landa. He talks about Landa. He 
admires Landa. He says so. He writes so.

And now along comes Rowley to say that Avner should cite Landa more 
and game theorists less, and that by not citing her more frequently 
Avner has "denied Janet Landa her full intellectual property rights." 
"promoting his own publications as meriting priority," and "blocked 
out Janet Landa's work from the mainstream economics literature."

Rowley looks to be the sleaziest academic provocateur I have seen in 
a long, long time...

Yours,

Brad DeLong