Along the same lines, there is a nice piece in _Microbe Magazine_ from last year on how microbiologist Herbert Conn [author of _The Story of Germ Life_] influenced Twain's writing, including _3,000 Years Among the Microbes_. Through the character Huck in _Microbes_, Twain explicitly acknowledged the influence of Conn: "In the World, when I was studying micrology (sic) under Prof. H. W. Conn, we knew all these facts." The whole story from _Microbe Magazine_ should be accessible here: http://www.microbemagazine.org/index.php/07-2011-home/3556-herbert-conn-mark-twains-microbiologist-muse  

Pat Ober

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Twain Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kevin Mac Donnell
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 9:34 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Twain and science

Twain was widely and well-read in several branches of science. He read Darwin and reviewed a book on early man in 1871 (Figuier's PRIMITIVE MAN), which he annotated in ways that indicate a close reading. He owned several books on astronomy -- Martin's FRIENDLY STARS, Proctor's NEW STAR ALTAS (with sky charts), and SIDE-LIGHTS ON ASTRONOMY by Newcomb, which he gave to a family member (the chapter about Father Hell whose discarded theories were proven true centuries later caught his interest). This also brings to mind his use of eclipses in CtY, TSA, FTE, Mysterious Stranger, Autobiography, and Christian Science and the setting for Capt Stormfield. He gave at least four books about birds to his daughters, and he owned at least four books about the social lives of wasps and ants. He also owned Clodd's STORY OF CREATION, Dirck's LIFE, TIMES & SCIENTIFIC LABOURS, and Gatty's PARABLES FROM NATURE.  I own all of the books I've mentioned but I'm sure I've forgotten some others. Alan Gribben records many more, and the new edition of his book will doubtless increase that number.

Twain also read most of the magazines in which he published -- Harper's Monthly and Weekly, North American Review, Century, etc. These mags often included stories on science, especially Harper's Weekly, which ran frequent in-depth stories on the latest scientific advances. Proving beyond a reasonable doubt that Twain read any specific article is not easy, but he mentions his magazine readings in passing in his letters and sometimes wrote letters to the editor or longer pieces in direct response to something he read in a magazine.

So, Twain was conversant in evolution, astronomy, birds, and bugs--but he could talk about other things too.

Kevin
@
Mac Donnell Rare Books
9307 Glenlake Drive
Austin TX 78730
512-345-4139
Member: ABAA, ILAB
*************************
You may browse our books at
www.macdonnellrarebooks.com

----- Original Message -----
From: <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 6:24 PM
Subject: Twain and science


>I just finished what there is of the =E2=80=9CSecret History of Eddypus, =
> the World Empire=E2=80=9D for the first time in probably 30 years. I =
> found it just as weird and unfocused as I remembered, but I did notice =
> something in it that had escaped me before: Mark Twain know a lot about =
> science, way more than I had realized.
>
> Although in Eddypus he=E2=80=99s usually getting his facts mixed up =
> (Izaak Walton for Isaac Newton, and so on), he has a very good grasp of =
> the development of science since the 15th century or so. His summary (p. =
> 360 in Fables of Man) of the changes in man=E2=80=99s idea of the =
> universe, and the demotion of Earth from the center of things to =
> =E2=80=9Ca potato lost in limitless vacancy=E2=80=9D is excellent. =
> Elsewhere he talks about spectroscopic analysis of stars to determine =
> what elements they contain: This was cutting-edge science in 1900, and =
> he seems to understand it well. I wonder how many people understand it =
> today, more than a century later?
>
> On a related note, in =E2=80=9CWas the World Made for Man,=E2=80=9D he =
> talks about the millions of years it took to for evolution to produce =
> the oyster. To start, he decides to put the Earth=E2=80=99s age at 100 =
> million years, using Lord Kelvin=E2=80=99s figure. The age of the planet =
> was one of the biggest scientific debates of the time; physicists sided =
> with Kelvin (as did Mark Twain), but geologists said the Earth had to be =
> billions of years old, to accommodate all the changes they were sure had =
> occurred. The discovery of the energy released in nuclear reactions =
> finally solved the problem (in the geologists=E2=80=99 favor), so Twain =
> picked the wrong horse in this debate, but clearly he knew what the =
> issues were at the time =E2=80=93 again, something that most people were =
> probably unaware of.
>
> Anyway, I just thought I=E2=80=99d mention this, since it=E2=80=99s =
> something that had never occurred to me before. I knew Twain read =
> history and so on, but he was also very well-read in science.
>
> -- Bob G.
>
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2171 / Virus Database: 2425/5000 - Release Date: 05/15/12
> 



-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2176 / Virus Database: 2425/5002 - Release Date: 05/16/12