SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
MIME-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: The reversed axes of supply and demand
From:
Nicola Giocoli <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 4 Feb 2011 20:18:36 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
base64
Reply-To:
[log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines) 
Fully agree with James. What he says about Marshall's notion of "real" competition is possibly one of the reasons (let's say the theoretical reason, though hardly the main one) for the conspicuous absence of a formal antitrust law or policy in Britain in the late 19th - early 20th century. The Marshallian view immunized Britain for a long time against the nirvana fallacy of the PC model underpinning most antitrust practices in US and Europe. 
Nicola Giocoli 
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device from WIND

ATOM RSS1 RSS2